![]() ![]() Nearly two streams with full GBit/s on the same hardware The same! As I see it personally, you could try out as was suggesting to tune your pfSenseĪ little here and there. That can be turned into a real UTM device is als not So "hardware hungry", but a router and a firewall Hardware, it is a little bit more near to the hardwareĭue to better driver support and here and there not I run MikroTik RouterOS, OpenWRT, pfSense on them,Īll Linux comes more to 1 GBit/s with lower powered I have some, a couple of PC ENgines APU boards, and I look into this, the more I see so many others with the Given power of the guys, many thanks for your response. Then I would really suggest to go with an installation of pfSense either 2.6 or 2.7 to get a better feeling to this I'm just trying to solve some technical issues i amĬoming across as I test the capabilities. Stunnel, acme, lightsquid and vpn packets runningfast! Squid & SuiqdGuard, ClamAV, Snort, pfBlocker-NG, tinc, You may be not missing something you want to install! High as many state here in the forum often. What is one or two days price on top of all, and now the prices from the Netgate appliances are not anymore so Normally on top of all! What is some ones hour price? You may not willing in Intel Core iCPU series.īut the most think is that you may fiddle out one or twoĭays that all is matching to your hardware and this comes Looking in the cheaper corner and if this must run 24/7 It is not cheap, but if you need the power you may not Power saving and fast enough, with M.2 and WiFi slot Supermicro Intel Atom C3000 8 / 12 / 16 Core No, some or featured UTM (pfSense), you can really trust on. In some cases we use here the following setup, matching nearly any needs and/or without any problems running This is not generally good for lower powered h/w Using is more powerful than the 6100, if it cant cope The hardware should be a little bit stronger! (pf) where the names (pfSense) comes from.Īnd the packet filter is doing more, it is working over any packet firewall rules based action, so it needs more time and power. PfSense has also NAT, but it a later part of the packet filter It is fast and not really comparable to an firewall, it is what a pure router is doing! Please don´t forget this. Ubuntu is doing normally the following, if configurated! I have tested with Ubuntu to confirm of the networkĪnd h/w i'm using is capable of the speed. The s/w or hardware is not capable its not for me. This is more than just a perforce comparison. ![]() Performance for my use cases when the hardware is Different hardware will allow be to test theĬapabilities and allow some limited estimations of ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |